Combinatorial Game Theory

of aggregate economic gains. Journal of Economic Theory 41, 133–153. Feldstein, M., 1975. On the theory of tax reform. Journal of Public Economics 6, 77–104. Guesnerie, R., 1977. On the direction of tax reform. Journal of Public Economics 7, 179–202. Malinvaud, E., 1972. Lectures on Microeconomic Theory. North Holland. Myerson, R., 1991. Game Theory-Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press. Shapley, L.S., 1969. Utility comparison and the theory of games. La Decision. Editions du CNRS, Paris,

- 12/03/2013 Accompagnement Bibliographie : 0 Linear Programming : foundations and Extension. R.J. Vanderbei, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming. Luenberger, David G.- Addison Wesley, 1973. Theory of linear and integer programming. Schrijver, Alexander - Wiley-Interscience publishers, 1986. - (Wiley Intersci. Series in Discrete Math. Optimization). Programmation mathématique : théorie et algorithmes, tome 1 et 2. Michel Minoux, Nouvelle édition

fonctions objectif. La fonction objectif ainsi obtenue s’appelle la fonction d’utilité de Keeney-Raiffa. On retrouve cette fonction dans la théorie de la fonction utilité multi-attribut exposée dans [Keeney et al. 93] (M.A.U.T, Multi Attribute Utility Theory). Cette théorie, issue des sciences d’aide à la décision, traite des propriétés et de la manière de créer une “fonction d’utilité”. 2.2.2 Présentation de la méthode On part du problème P (voir page 18). On transforme la partie “objectifs” en utilisant

interesting, since there are so few ‘hard’ facts to go on. As a result, a number of handy speculations have acquired the status of facts; and this in itself may serve as a warning. For example, it is usually stated that Eudoxus of Cnidus invented the theory of proportions in Euclid’s book V. There is evidence for this, but it is rather slender. Fowler is suspicious, and Knorr more accepting, but both, as specialists, necessarily argue about its status. In all general histories, it has acquired the status

conservative measure, putting a lot of emphasis on the worst case scenarios. It also produces poor solutions for the scenarios other than the one with the maximum cost. This measure is best used when an opponent will try to challenge your solution: e.g. game A.I, or when a competitor will make some decisions after your company. However, in logistic optimisation this will most of the time focus on the scenarios with the worst plant failure, and not take into account the scenario where no plant failure occurs

f., électrophorèse f. cataphoretic(al) adj. (chim.), cataphorétique cataplexy n. (path., zoo.), cataplexie f. cataract n. (path.), cataracte f. (maladie oculaire) Catarhina n. pl. (zoo.), Catarhiniens m. catarrh n. (bio.), catarrhe m. catastrophe theory n. (math.), théorie f. des catastrophes catazonal adj. (géol.), catazonal catching adj., contagieux (méd.), ~ diode n. (électr.), diode f. de limitation de tension catecholamine n. (bio.), catécholamine f., amine f. cérébral catena n. (info.), chaîne

f., électrophorèse f. cataphoretic(al) adj. (chim.), cataphorétique cataplexy n. (path., zoo.), cataplexie f. cataract n. (path.), cataracte f. (maladie oculaire) Catarhina n. pl. (zoo.), Catarhiniens m. catarrh n. (bio.), catarrhe m. catastrophe theory n. (math.), théorie f. des catastrophes catazonal adj. (géol.), catazonal catching adj., contagieux (méd.), ~ diode n. (électr.), diode f. de limitation de tension catecholamine n. (bio.), catécholamine f., amine f. cérébral catena n. (info.), chaîne