In a few years, new technologies upset the tools, methods, infrastructures and work methods in the sector of the media and communication. This phenomenon does not cease developing, while taking new forms, often unforeseen. The press, but more specifically the media must have a capacity of permanent adaptation, in an environment of competition which is renewed unceasingly. This is why it would be interesting to see which the consequences of this evolution for the media are? The journalist is thus confronted with new problems and must meet a greater ethical requirement. Is its role for modified as much?

“The irruption of numerical new technologies is about upsetting not only the economy of the traditional media, but also their modes of organization, their structures and their contents”[1]. Vis-a-vis a numerical reorganization in progress, the press and the media in general are seen confronted to revisit its trades in the very short term. It is not clean in Europe: the whole world knows the same evolution. With the successes of blogs - RSS - podcasts - search engines - access providers investing in information - sites of classifieds - information on mobiles etc. The press must have a capacity of permanent adaptation in an environment of competition which is renewed unceasingly. All the media are touched. No company escapes a handing-over in question of its offers like its strategic choices: the press in the highest degree, but also news agencies, television channels, radios. The tendencies indeed appear to develop. After the daily press and the professional newspapers, it is the whole of the sector of the press magazine and the television which is from now on concerned.

The new communication networks constitute today a real challenge for journalism. The Internet has indeed upset research and the production and information circulation. The adaptation necessary yields the place to the innovation. The journalists are not satisfied any more to put on line a