In the history of information we always heard about the lives of some characters that have spread nationally or internationally. Even if it’ s about a publicfigure like lady Diana or a common person like Sarah Scazzi scandals have always come to light. In this perspective we can say that the media often ten to disregard theprivacy and suffering people. Frequently ,the medias speaks of the death of a member who is dear to us detailing the seconds before his death which may besubject to discomfort and pain generator for us. So very often the information hunters do not really care about that because many of them are just looking for a scoop fora shock info. We have in Italy the example of the politician Silvio Berlusconi accused of statutory rape in the Ruby case. Television channels have played forseveral weeks on the scandal in order to increase their hearings; the newspapers have spoken without worrying about the image that this spread could bring to theinternational scale about the serenity of the Italian government. But if we are interested in the definition of the word media to his original function we will noticedthat it is quite normal that they put in light the new shock. Indeed, the media must convey the information, to counterbalance the power exercised by the governmentand prevent the people. Media, in the dissemination of information can be a way to fight so that what happened in the past don’t happens in the future
I thinkthat it is good that the media perform their role and power but the dissemination of information must be made in the right proportions for constructive purposes
Lire le document complet
Veuillez vous inscrire pour avoir accès au document.