1996 singles

Oviposition period was significantly longer at 28 (3.2 d) than 24ºC (2.3 d). Days of oviposition in the laboratory were similar to those in the field, 2.4 and 3.1 d in 1996 and 1997. Females in the laboratory oviposited more eggs at warmer than cooler temperatures. In the field, each female oviposited 29.6 and 44.9 eggs in 1996 and 1997.Cool and warm temperatures tended to increase and decrease, respectively, survival and developmental rate. More millet head miners survived better when fed Bio-Serv®

ABSTRACT/RÉSUMÉ We construct a revised version of the Barro and Lee (1996) data set for a sample of OECD countries using previously unexploited sources and following a heuristic approach to obtain plausible time profiles for attainment levels by removing sharp breaks in the data that seem to reflect changes in classification criteria. It is then shown that these revised data perform much better than the Barro and Lee (1996) or Nehru et al. (1995) series in a number of growth specifications. We

fait le choix d’un ancrage nominal trop rigide. Les expériences multiples des pays du Sud en matière de change (ancrage à une monnaie, ancrage à un panier de monnaies, flottement géré,…) ne font que confirmer la remarque de Mussa et al. (2000) : “No single exchange rate regime is most appropriate for all such countries, and the regime that is appropriate for a particular country may change over time”. Parmi ces expériences, celle du Maroc est particulièrement intéressante. Alors que la Tunisie, pays

potentiels (Kestemont and Baras, 2001). Une forte densité peut aussi rendre plus difficile l’accès à l’aliment par encombrement dans le bassin, les individus augmentant alors leur activité et leur dépense énergétique pour se nourrir (Alanara and Brannas, 1996; Marchand and Boisclair, 1998), ce qui peut affecter l’efficacité alimentaire. Par ailleurs, une forte densité peut affecter la qualité de l’eau et, en conséquence, la croissance et l’efficacité d’utilisation des aliments (Lemarié, communication personnelle)

Steiger, 2001). Cet accroissement, relativement récent, pose toutefois un certain nombre de problèmes quant à la qualité même des recherches comme le soulignent par exemple Brannick (1995), Williams (1995), Kelloway (1995), Baumgartner et Homburg (1996), Chin (1998), Steiger (2001), Jarvis, MacKenzie et Podsakoff (2003) ou encore Kline (2004). L’auteur tient à remercier les lecteurs anonymes pour leurs propositions pertinentes et constructives qui ont contribué à l’amélioration de cet article

wake: houses, electric pylons, cars, crops: basically 22 ON TARGET 2e — LIVRE DU PROFESSEUR © BELIN 2009 tornado” struck Kansas and was visible from several miles away. As impressive as it was, it caused minor damage and only destroyed a single barn as the funnel-shaped cloud missed the town. However, 1929 was a very important year in American history more generally, as it refers to the Wall Street Crash or Stock Market Crash, also known as “Black Thursday.” The crash actually started on

compatible with the model’s existing ones [3, pp. 31–35]. First, trust and perceived risk in a Web retailer deal with a single transaction decision (task-specific) bounded by the surrounding circumstances (context-specific) at a single point in time (timespecific). Perceived usefulness and ease of use also deal with a single technology-acceptance decision in a given system at a single point in time. Second, while objective reality may play a role, trust and perceived risk predominantly deal with a subjective

informations en mémoire qui constituent à la fois les données et les programmes : une seule unité de commande traitant une seule séquence d’instruction (Single Instruction Stream) et une seule unité d’exécution (UAL) traitant une unique séquence de données (Single Data Stream). Cette architecture est donc appelée SISD (Single Instruction Single Data). Un bus unique relie les différents modules. Cette architecture à commande unique constitue un frein au traitement parallèle. 2) Architecture

“Portfolio matrices have been widely prescribed…yet they have not been tested in a scientific manner” (p. 91). While Armstrong and Brodie’s results are very interesting, the study itself has several limitations. First, the study only focused on a single investment decision (i.e. would participants forego a profitable investment in a business unit that held ‘dog’ status). This is hardly a complete test of the BCG model. For instance, in a corporate context, the funds foregone may have been allocated

as the purchasers buys the property first and then looks for finance. The transactions look more like a loan rather than a sale he contends. This presumption was confirmed by the case of Dato’ Haji Nik Mahmud bin Daud v Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad [1996] 1 CLJ 737 where the presiding judge thought that there was no intention of the parties (customer and bank) to effect the transfer of the property, and that it was merely a device to facilitate the BBA transaction. This decision makes us think that