Inequality

programs for women further constrained women to shift away from their initial antipolitics stance10. SERNAM initiatives were divided in three categories : “legislative reform, special social programs for women, and policies aimed at confronting inequality in society as a whole”11. This diversification and engagement to participate in political dialogue enabled the decentralization and specialization of feminist activists and women groups visible today, but also brought ideological confrontations

économique A. J. Scott et M. Storper / Géographie, économie, Société 8 (2006) 169-192 187 Références Acs, Z. 2000, Regional Innovation, Knowledge, and Global Change. New York: Pinter. Aghion, P., 1998, « Inequality and Economic Growth » in P. Aghion and Williamson, Growth, Inequality and Globalization, Cambridge: CUP, pp. 5-102. Alonso, W. 1980. « Five Bell Shapes in Development », Papers of the Regional Science Association 45: 5-16. Amsden, A. 1989, Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late

Labor Contribution in China, Journal of Economic Research, No. 10, 1999 - Mankiw G. N., Romer D., Weil D., A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 1992 - Chen J., Fleisher B., Regional Income Inequality and Economic Growth in China, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 22, 1996 - Almanac of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade, 1985 à 2001 - Third National Industrial Census Of the PRC, 1995 - China Industrial Yearbook (1989 et

The Standard of Living, Cambridge University Press. SEN A. (1992), Inequality Reexamined, Oxford Clarendon Press. SEN A. (1993), Markets and Freedom, Oxford Economic Papers, 45. SEN A. (1994), Markets and the Freedom to Choose, in The Ethical Foundations of the Market Economy, Horst Siebert. SEN A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Alfred Knopf Inc. SIROWY L., INKELES A. (1990), The Effects of Democracy on Economy Growth and Inequality : A Review, Studies in Comparative International Development, 25

Zones, Paris, 220p.Levine, J. & Meiners, E.R. (2020). The feminist and the sex offender – Confronting sexual harm, ending state violence, Verso Books, London, 208p.Lipsitz Bem, S. (1993). The lenses of gender – Transforming the debate on sexual inequality, Yale university press, Yale, 244p.Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender, Yale University Press, Yale, 424p.Lorber, J. (2022). The New Gender Paradox, Polity, Cambridge, 113p.Macht, A. (2020). Fatherhood and love – The social construction of masculine

|397 |6,2 % | There exists an important inequality between the urban and rural population and this movement of urbanization generates either positive effects (as increase of revenues, democratization of new technology and consumers’ goods…) or negative effects (as the inequality between Chinese populations, the increase of the pollution…). d) Technological Online consumption is more and more

which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions (like the family) accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. This represents inequality (more versus less), but defined from below, not from above. It suggests that a society's level of inequality is endorsed by the followers as much as by the leaders. Power and inequality, of course, are extremely fundamental facts of any society and anybody with some international experience will be aware that 'all societies are unequal

DORTIER (dir.), La communication appliquée aux organisations et à la formation : [actes de forum], Paris, Demos, p. 71-84. BERNOUX, Philippe (1999), La sociologie des entreprises, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 400 p. BLAU, Peter Michael (1977), Inequality and Heterogeneity : a Primitive Theory of Social Structure, New York, Free Press, 307 p. BLAU, Peter Michael (1974), ≪ Presidential Address : Parameters of Social Structures ≫, American Sociological Review, vol. 39, p. 615-635. BOUGNOUX, Daniel

là encore un futur effet papillon… -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. « capability»= « un ensemble de vecteurs de fonctionnement, reflétant la liberté dont dispose la personne pour mener un type de vie ou un autre » : A. Sen, Inequality Reexamined , 1992, p.40 : “ a set of vectors of functionings, reflecting the person’s freedom to lead a type of life or another ”

in the same order) or have chaotic behavior, seeming to evolve by chance, even if the solution is by definition deterministic. Note: The term inequality corresponds to a different definition [4]. If in some special cases [5] the subjects are related in the general case they are sufficiently remote to warrant separate treatment. The inequality is therefore treated in a separate article however it not easy to understand and plan to find the result. we have to set logical methodology on your