Object

Restriction of competition by object or effect is probably the most important condition to be met for an agreement to infringe Article 81(1) EC. The concept of restriction by object was first introduced in the landmark case Consten and Grundig , where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that all agreements limiting parallel trade between Member States were in principle regarded as restrictive of competition by object . Moreover, it was found there is no need to take account of the concrete effects

2943808 **Attempting to validate BBT **Attempting to validate NBT **Attempting to validate BBT refcounts **Attempting to validate header NID high-water marks **Beginning PST/OST recovery **Attempting to recover all top-level objects !!TC (nid=60E) missing required column (10970003) !!Folder invalid high-water-mark (nidi=E55, nidiHigh=F38) **Attempting to walk all folders !!TC (nid=12E) missing required column (10970003) !!TC (nid=806E)

to introduce persistence. Until now, the aspect-oriented community has made a significant effort to apply AOP in providing orthogonal object persistence (see e.g. [25, 27, 28]). Accordingly, it is crucial to assess whether these proposals comply with the principle of orthogonal persistence, i.e. whether they do not require to prepare code in order to make objects persistent. This paper critically discusses the extent to which current AO persistence proposals meet orthogonal persistence. Thereto,

Cognition, 20 (1985) 191-208 1 Object permanence in five-month-old infants* RENCE BAILLARGEON** Universityof Illinois ELIZABETH S. SPELKE Universityof Pennsylvania STANLEY WASSERMAN Universityof Illinois Abstract A new method was devised to test object permanence in young infants. Fivemonth-old infants were habituated to a screen that moved back and forth through a 180-degree arc, in the manner of a drawbridge. After infants reached habituation, a box was centered behind

3/11 Lycée Gustave EIFFEL BTS Informatique de Gestion : ARLE OID Object Identifier L'OID est une suite d’entiers (chemin jusqu’à l’objet dans l’arbre) org 1.3 dod 1.3.6 internet 1.3.6.1 directory 1.3.6.1.1 mgmt 1.3.6.1.2 mib-2 1.3.6.1.2.1 Les MIB standards sont sous l'OID 1.3.6.1.2.1 (mib, mib-2) experimental 1.3.6.1.3 private 1.3.6.1.4 Les MIB privées sont sous l'OID 1.3.6.1.4.1 (enterprises) enterprises 1.3.6.1.4.1 Object Descriptor = nom de l’objet (unique). Ex : SysName (Nom de l'Administrateur)

instantiation) ... public static void main(String[] args) { List<String> l=... } 2 Type paramétré et Java 1.4 ● En Java sans type paramétré, on crée une liste d'Object. public class List/*<T>*/ { void add(/*T*/Object e) {...} Object/*T*/ get(int index) {...} } ● Comme tous les objets héritent de Object : ... public static void main(String[] args) { List/*<String>*/ l=new List/*<String>*/(); l.add("toto"); // ok grace au sous typage String s=l.get(0); // erreur String s2=(String)l.get(0); // ok } ● C'est

{ Object[] sortedData = new Object[size]; public void add(StudentRecord X) { // … Name a = X.getLastName(); Name b = sortedData[k].getLastName(); if (a.lessThan(b)) … else … //do something } … } 9 Principes de conception (1) : Exemple Solution 1 class StudentRecord { private Name lastName; private Name firstName; private long ID; public boolean lessThan(Object X) { return lastName.lessThan(X.lastName);} … // etc } class SortedList { Object[] sortedData

programming. Increasingly, objects are “dynamic” in the sense that their structure and behavior is not captured by a static type, or at least not one that the compiler knows about when compiling your program. Some examples include • objects from dynamic programming languages, such as Python or Ruby • COM objects accessed through IDispatch • ordinary .NET types accessed through reflection • objects with changing structure, such as HTML DOM script objects • data readers

tailor them to your model. Features Covered in This Section ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Adding the Hair and Fur modifier. Using a sub-object level to control hair placement. Modifying hair settings, including material properties. Rendering hair. Using the Garment Maker. Applying the Cloth modifier. Locking points on the cloth. Adding space warps and collision objects to the cloth. Running a Cloth simulation. Adjusting fabric properties. Hair The tutorials included in this section walk you through

Fonctions et variables statiques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2 Le type Object 15 2.1 Dénition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2 Règles d'aectation : transtypage implicite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.3 Transtypage explicite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.4 Méthodes de la classe Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.5 La classe Paire . . . . . .