Paper

Références Bordo, M et Eichengreen, B (2002) : “Crises now and then: Lessons from the last era of financial globalisation”, NBER, Working Paper n°8716. Borio, C et Lowe, P ( 2002 ) : “Assessing the risk of banking crises”, Bank of International Settelements, pp 43-54. Caprio, G et Klingebiel, D (1996) : “Bank insolvencies: cross country experience”, Policy Research, Working paper n°1620, World bank. Caprio, G et Klingebiel, D (1999) : “Episodes of systematic and borderline financial crises”, Washington, DC

unusually large fraction of subprime mortgages originated in 2006 and 2007 becoming delinquent or in foreclosure only months later. The crisis spurred massive media attention; many different explanations of the crisis have been proffered. The goal of this paper is to answer the question: “What do the data tell us about the possible causes of the crisis?” To this end we use a loan-level database containing information on about half of all U.S. subprime mortgages originated between 2001 and 2007. The relatively

fellow members of the Management Control Association for constructive comments on earlier ideas for this paper. Abstract Managers are continually under pressure to measure the performance of their organisation, but there is little empirical evidence about the impact of measurement on performance. Furthermore, many measurement tools and techniques lack clear theoretical foundations. This paper proposes investigations into neglected aspects of organisational performance measurement, reflecting the

Jerry Caprio, Serdar Dinc, John Roberts, Paul Romer and seminar participants at Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Stanford University Department of Economics and Graduate School of Business, and The World Bank All remaining errors are ours. This paper represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent that of any organization with which they are or have been affiliated. Thomas Hellmann, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5015, Tel: (650) 723-6815

continuer l’atelier sans partager tout ce que cette situation dramatique soulève comme questionnements et l’équipe se demandait si « ça n’allait pas tout remettre en cause ». Pendant une bonne heure et demie, j’ai écouté l’équipe, en notant sur le paper-board tout ce qui était posé comme question. J’ai donc demandé ensuite à l’équipe de me dire ce qu’ils voulaient que je fasse de ce qu’ils me livraient. Suite à ce qu’ils m’avaient dit et à la manière dont ils avaient posé les choses, j’avais à mon

relative nouveauté des formes d’intégration régionales institutionnelles ne permet pas encore de faire. Références AHLUWALIA, P. Discriminating contagion: an alternative explanation of contagious currency crises in emerging markets. IMF working paper, WP/00/14, février 2000, 38p. ALLEGRET, J.P., AYADI, M., HAOUAOUI KHOUNI, L. Un modèle de choix de régime de change : aspects théoriques et analyse empirique. Proposition de communication au colloque, Hammamet, Tunisie, 18 et 19 mai 2006

secteurs dans lesquels les EAPE combinent les deux types de stratégies. Cette question mérite des recherches ultérieures. 16 Bibliographie Akinkugbe O. (2003): «Flow of Foreign Direct Investment to Hitherto Neglected Developing Countries», Discussion paper n° 2003/02, January. Amcham Survey (2001) : «A Survey of Executive Perceptions about Business and Investing in Morocco», Chambre Américaine De Commerce, Décembre, Casablanca, http://www.amcham-morocco.com/publications.html Asiedu E. (2003)

l'esprit de mes interlocuteurs se réduire aux thèmes que j'ai développés en 2007 et 2008 dans mon ouvrage Gutenberg 2.0, le futur du livre (M21 éditions), et qui traitait principalement de la technologie d'affichage e-ink (encre électronique) / e-paper (papier électronique). Ce livre blanc a donc un double objectif : 1. D'abord, définir ce qu'est la prospective, appliquée aux domaines du livre et de l'édition, et ce que cette discipline nouvelle peut apporter, concrètement, à l'interprofession

Steve Levitt for urging me to complete this study. The editor and two anonymous referees provided very insightful comments that helped to shape the manuscript. Remarks of Glenn Harrison, Emir Kamenica, Uri Simonsohn, and Chad Syverson improved the paper considerably. During the vetting process I learned of a fascinating experiment by Bardsley (2005) that predated my experiment. As discussed in the text, Bardsley uses a similar framing exercise and finds qualitatively similar results. 1 The ultimatum

#1 10-12 set #2 10-12 set #3 10-12 Rest Between Sets Stretch 2:00 minute rest 1:30 minute rest 1:00 minute rest 2:00 minute rest 2:00 minute rest 2:00 minute rest No liability is assumed for the information provided on this paper, on strengthcoach.com or any products advertised on strengthcoach.com. The opinions are those of the strengthcoach.com writers. The text on all pages of strengthcoach.com does not provide medical advice on exercise or diet. Specific medical advice