Tijuana bronze case study
DIRECT MATERIALS 16 20 22
LABOUR RUN LABOUR (7500X.25*16/7500)= 4 (12500X.5*16/12500)= 8 (4000X.4*16/4000)= 6.4
TOTAL OVER HEAD 680000 GIVEN PLUS SET UPLABOUR COST ( 16 X 168) = 682688
TOTALRUN OVER HEAD COST 155600 ( 9725 X 16)
OVERHEAD ABSROBTION RATE 4.387455013
OVERHEAD ASSIGNED 17.54982005 35.0996401 28.07971208
UNIT PRODCOST 37.54982005 63.0996401 56.47971208
2 CONTIBUTIONMARGIN =SALES LESS VARIABLECOST SALES 57.78 81.26 97.07 VARIABLECOST 16 20 22
CONTRIBUTION MARGIN 41.78 61.26 75.07
ANALYSIS: The flowcontrollers have the highest contribution margin.However overhead cost shouldnot be disregarded since marginal custometrs are willing to buy products based on marginalprices .
3 overhead allocation rate for material handling /receiving =( 200000+ 20000 ) divided by total mat cost 0.480349345 related over head 7.68558952 9.6069869 10.56768559
other overhead on machine hour depreciation 270000 engineering 100000 pack& ship 60000 maintenance 30000 460000
machinehours 10800
rate 42.59259259
overhead assigned 21.2962963 21.2962963 8.518518519
new costing valve pump controller material 16 20 22 materialrelated o/h 7.68558952 9.6069869 10.56768559 setup labour 0.02 0.05 0.48 direct labour 4 8 6.4 other overhead 21.2962963 21.2962963 8.518518519 total 49.00188582 58.9532832 47.96620411
ABC VALVES PUMP FLOW CONTROLLER TOTAL
4 MATERIAL 120000 250000 88000 458000 LABOUR 30000 100000 25600 155600 OVERHEAD