Democracy

independence in 1776, conducted a war that defeated one of the greatest military powers of its day, and invented a new political entity, a progressive democracy that subsequently became a sovereign independent nation. Today, this nation, the United States of America, serves not only as an exemplar of the struggle for liberty and equality, as well as democracy, it has also become the chief purveyor and protector of such ideals. THE DIFFERENCE (à developer) Life–– Concerning life, Jesus

Constitution when she first volunteered as an interpreter for pashto speaking detainees. However, her fight for giving identities to what are no more than serial numbers in Guantánamo, seems to suggest a new definition for what is called ‘American Democracy’. Thus, Khan offers the readers an introspective vision at the heart of a fortress where no law nor right pervade, and where innumerable breaches to Human Rights end up ‘Classified’. By such testimonies, she demonstrates that even the most powerful

institutions were then introduced: 1. Development of international law to promote the peaceful resolution of disputes; 2. Establishment of international organizations; 3. Construction of a new international morality in favour of peace; 4. Promoting democracy and free trade. But like all relationships, different thoughts have been treated throughout the 20th century, theories differ on the importance and vision of international relations. We're going through this issue studied two different theories

contrary: in his studies of the historical development of social and political orders, Max Weber identified “charismatic authority” as one of the three main forms of political legitimacy (1957). Moreover, studies of the early phases of representative democracy have emphasized that political representation largely centered on local notables rather than nationally identifiable collective interests and loyalties (Manin 1997, 202-203). In fact, it may very well be argued that politics in its pre-democratic

ville, quartier, décentralisation, Paris Limits and stakes of local democracy. The example of the 14th district of Paris Abstract: What is local democracy? What is its purpose? How does it work and how to implement it? This article aims at answering such questions by studying the specific case of Paris’14th district, in an attempt to analyse the limits and the stakes of local democracy today. Key words: local democracy, politics, policy, city, decentralisation, Paris H Hurand Anne– «Enjeux

communication présentée à la Conférence ISTR 2004, Toronto, Canada. Coleman, J., 1958, Nigeria: Background to Nationalism, Berkeley: University of California Press. Diamond, L., 1994, «Rethinking Civil Society: Towards Democratic Consolidation», Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 4-17. Diamond, L., 2001., «Civic Communities and Predatory Societies», communication présentée à la conference sur «Culture Matters: A Forum for Business, Education and Training Professionals», Intercultural Management Institute, American

années 1930 virent le retour des intérêts nationaux privés et la période des accords multilatéraux internationaux en faveur du pacifisme n’était plus de mise. Selon l’ancien président américain Woodrow Wilson : (« The world must be made safe for democracy »). Focus sur la théorie de la Paix démocratique Parmi les points prônés par Wilson, figure : la fin de la diplomatie secrète, la liberté de navigation et de commerce, la réduction des armements, et le règlement des rivalités coloniales

Own Things /Le droit à votre propres choses # 18. 18. Freedom of Thought/ La liberté de pensée # 19. 19. Freedom of Expression/ Liberté d'expression # 20. 20. The Right to Public Assembly/ Le droit de réunion publique # 21. 21. The Right to Democracy/ Droit à la démocratie # 22. 22. Social Security/ La sécurité sociale # 23. 23. Workers' Rights/ Droits des travailleurs # 24. 24. The Right to Play/ Le Right to Play # 25. 25. Food and Shelter for All/ Nourriture et abri pour tous # 26. 26

encontre. ABSTRACT Democracy in Aristotle's Politics is a work of research carried out in order to better understand the concept of democracy which is used by everyone but of which we do not really know the foundations. It is by way of illustration that this study will focus exclusively on a fundamental work in the political philosophy that is the Politics of Aristotle, the Greek philosopher of antiquity. The first part relates to the characteristics of democracy. We first highlight the

basées sur la gouvernance, telles que celle proposée par Ian Low (2006) : « The estab- lishment of order, far more than the creation of form describes the labor of the architect ; order(s) that seek to participate in and con- tribute to the work of democracy in a globalizing world ». Après avoir présenté l’évolution des considérations éthiques issues de l’analyse de l’objet jusqu’aux caractéristiques du processus, nous focaliserons main- tenant sur les aspects de la gouvernance.