Judge

(Esmeralda) Belle et jeune danseuse d'origine gitane. [pic] Djali (Djali) La chèvre de Esméralda. [pic] Phoébus (Phoebus) Capitaine des gardes du Roi. [pic] Achille (Achilles) Le cheval de Phoébus. [pic] Le Juge Claude Frollo (Judge Claude Frollo/Minister of Justice Frollo) Le plus haut magistrat de Paris, ennemi juré des gitans mais amoureux, en secret, d'Esméralda. [pic] Le garde brutal et le garde malotru (British Guard and Oafish Guard) Deux gardes qui tentent d'arrêter

their traditions to their new country. A lot of persons follow traditions and this should not prevent them from doing what they want. Traditions are often restrectives, they limit people in their freedom. The persons who belong at the same group judge themselves. The eyes of other it's much important in that culture where traditions have a big place.Traditionalists live in the past and critics the present and the future because for them the anciens time was better. Ad a conclusion I think that

or two staff and these rely upon stories which are increasingly brought to them by representatives. At the end of the day, journalism is more and more compromise as there is a lack of middles to finance this activity and a lake of target able to judge it to the right value.

(not necessarily capitals) 4. Name of hobbies a person could have 5. Name of articles of clothing Round 6 1. Things that can be found in a bedroom 2. Terms relating to the legal system in America (ex. If the letter is J you could say Judge) 3. Titles of English-written books 4. Name of an English-speaking actor/actress/celebrity 5. Electrical appliances Round 7 1. Names of important American historical figures 2. Titles of nursery rhymes 3. Things that can be found

justice system is not fair since it is true that in certain circumstances, courts do make mistakes and condemn people who had no other choice than to break the law. However, I think that even if the sentence could be less strict, courts still have to judge these people because admitting one can break the law without getting trouble could lead the world into anarchy and chaos. For all these reasons I do not think that it is sometimes acceptable to do something illegal.

apparaissent des comportements restrictif de concurrence => mobilisation populaire des fermiers contres les entreprises ferroviaires par exemple… U.S DOJ, antitrust division est en charge de mener les enquêtes pour ensuite les présenter au District Judge, qui va condamner des entreprises. Il ya une différence entre droit de la concurrence et droit du consommateur. Au niveau de l’union, le droit de la concurrence qui n’est pas consumériste, il garantit la libre concurrence dans le marché sans

that the conflict between the former slaves’ descendents and the former slave owners’ descendents have to end : the past is over, now things have to change to make a better future. It’s not the colour of the skin which make the person, so we mustn’t judge somebody by that, cause it is not the reflect of the content of his character ! Only brotherhood and freedom should be ringing everywhere in America : Blacks and Whites should be able to share the same activities, the same places... Martin Luther King

verdict is that the woman was found not guilty because it is a justifiable homicide. The woman wanted to protect herself. It is also preferable to kill the husband because he can kill her during the aggression. Spousal abuse crimes are not easy to judge because of the circumstances which they happen. The jury has the delicate task to weight the pros and cons and try to pronounce the best possible verdict.

(b) le modèle à cinq facteurs (McCrae et Costa , 1991 ; 1999), (c) l’état d’orientation vers l’action (Kuhl, 1994), (d) la recherche de maîtrise (Dweck, 1986) et (e) le concept de « core self evaluation » (Erez et Judge, 2001 ; Judge et Bono, 1998 ; Judge, Locke et Durham, 1997 ; Judge, Locke Durham et Kluger, 1998). (a) Le besoin de réalisation de soi (McClelland, Atkinson, Clark et Lowell, 1953) est le premier construit théorique basé à l’origine sur un test psychodramatique (TAT test) ayant

CRIMINAL LAW AND CIVIL LAW In Civil Court, the judge builds hypotheses and tests them. In Civil Court: the balance of probabilities -> damages The standard of proof In Criminal Court: beyond reasonable doubt -> imprisonment The standard of proof is different according to the court. In a civil case, you can be found liable and you have to pay damages. The Magistrates’ court deals with 95% of criminal cases. Class I: murder, rape (with premeditation)